东芝toshiba mq02abd100hh和7200转哪个好

关于7200 1t 日立与东芝 MQ01ABD100H 1T 固态混合的速度比较评测_笔记本吧_百度贴吧
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&签到排名:今日本吧第个签到,本吧因你更精彩,明天继续来努力!
本吧签到人数:0成为超级会员,使用一键签到本月漏签0次!成为超级会员,赠送8张补签卡连续签到:天&&累计签到:天超级会员单次开通12个月以上,赠送连续签到卡3张
关注:1,521,724贴子:
关于7200 1t 日立与东芝 MQ01ABD100H 1T 固态混合的速度比较评测收藏
MQ01ABD100H容量1TB搭载8GB 固态相当于磁盘2级缓存,另有32MB DRAM缓存,转速为5400RPM,9.5毫米厚,sata3接口。
雷神ST Pro新生代游戏本:三面金属25mm轻巧便携为“十”力代颜
hdtune测试速度:
首先看看连续传输:两盘最高都是140M/s。由于东芝还是5400盘体。平均速度还是比日历落后20M样子。差距不大。但我们看看sshd 1t固态优化后的表现最高到了200M/s。高于日历7200 60M。那么再看看寻道速度,选择hdtune错误扫描选项卡,勾选快速,点开始。日历7200是37s。东芝第一次是40s。然后它后台会优化进固态内。第2次扫东芝只用4s。完全固态表现!10倍差距完胜
最后我们知道开机和开程序,浏览网页这类平常应用其实都是小图片,框架,文字,批处理文件组成,大概大小在1k到10M之间。那么就需要磁盘在盘片上来回寻找这些在不同物理地址的小文件,别看物理硬盘连续传输速度上100M/s。到了这些应用磁盘来回寻道损耗的时间大大拖慢了他的平均传输速度。我们用hdtune的随机寻道来模拟这些应用。看看7200和这个固态混合两者速度差异。
这些信息希望对大家选着7200 还是sshd 有所帮助
挽这是一条凑字数的小尾巴噢耶耶耶耶   --来自助手版贴吧客户端
混合硬盘划不来。。。这是一条凑字数的小尾巴噢耶耶耶耶   --来自助手版贴吧客户端
这是我的小q 就准备换着款sshd了
这种SLC闪存的混合硬盘让人更放心吧(相比希捷的混合硬盘来说)
登录百度帐号推荐应用
为兴趣而生,贴吧更懂你。或| 商品搜索:
| 热门装机配件产品线: |
& 东芝1TB 5400转64M
笔记本固态混合硬盘(MQ02ABD100H)参数
参数显示:显示全部参数隐藏相同参数
产品名称 &&&产品图片
产品价格&&&价格趋势网上购买-&&&主体 &&&品牌东芝(TOSHIBA)&&&系列2.5英寸笔记本固态混合硬盘&&&型号MQ02ABD100H&&&类别9.5*69.85*100mm&&&类型SSHD混合硬盘&&&规格 &&&接口类型SATA接口&&&容量1TB&&&单碟容量500GGB&&&缓存64MB&&&转速5400转&&&特性 &&&特性NAND Flash 容量 8GiB&&&材质NAND Flash 容量 8GiB&&&尺寸9.5*69.85*100mm&&&工作温度0℃-60℃&&&保存温度-40℃-65℃&&&
热门硬盘热门东芝硬盘[比较]关注该产品的用户还喜欢500-799元硬盘[比较]
高清大图推荐文章??????????热门产品推荐产品??????????????????????????????
,,最精彩的内容尽在泡泡网
&&Copyright &
PCPOP, All Rights Reserved 泡泡网 版权所有
求鉴定更多商品名称:
京&&东&&价:
商品评分:
评&&价&&数:
多品类齐全,轻松购物
快多仓直发,极速配送
好正品行货,精致服务
省天天低价,畅选无忧微星 GL72 6QF Xotic PC Edition 笔记本电脑简短评测 - Notebookcheck
微星 GL72 6QF Xotic PC Edition 笔记本电脑简短评测
Allen Ngo ( Yuchen Wang), 03/22/2016
大屏幕,低价格。微星GT72是一款旗舰机型,不过这家生产商也有很多主流市场机型。我们测试的全新GL72起售价不足1000美元(约6502人民币),搭配了GTX 960M显卡,我们将把它与其他低价游戏本进行比较。
Test device courtesy of
2.6&GHz Graphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 2048 MB, Core: 1097&MHz, Memory: 5410&MHz, 354.35, OptimusMemory16384&MB& , DDR4 SDRAM, 1196.5 MHz, 14-14-14-35, 双通道Display17.3 inch 16:9,
pixel, TN, ID: CMN1735, Name: Chi Mei N173HGE-E11, glossy: noMainboardIntel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)StorageSamsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe, 256&GB& , 第二硬盘: WDC WD10JPVX-22J3T0SoundcardIntel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio ControllerConnections1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机和麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD (XC/HC)NetworkingQualcomm Atheros AR PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 420 x 287Battery43 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam: 30fps@720pAdditional featuresSpeakers: 四个扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 快速开始说明,质保卡, Nahimic, MSI System Control Manager, MSI Afterburner, 12 Months WarrantyWeight2.8 kg, Power Supply: 460 g
Price1000 USD&
>> >> >>&>>&>>&>> >>&>> >> >> >>&>>&>>
&&&&&&MSI GT72S 6QE-071PL &&&&&&Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV &&&&&&MSI GL72 6QF &&&&&&MSI GE72-6QF8H11 &&&&&&Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 &&&&&&Asus GL771JW-T7082H &&&&&&Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 &&&&&&MSI PE70-2QEi581 &&&&&&Gigabyte P37X v5
Front: No connectivity
Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, SD reader, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI-out, Mini-DisplayPort, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones
173.9cd/m²181.5cd/m²170.9cd/m²173cd/m²194.7cd/m²163.3cd/m²203.6cd/m²207.2cd/m²182.5cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessX-Rite i1Pro Basic 2Maximum: 207.2&cd/m² Average: 183.4&cd/m² Minimum: 9.8&cd/m²Brightness Distribution:&79 %Center on Battery: 194.7&cd/m²Contrast: 788:1 (Black: 0.247&cd/m²)&DE Color 11.44 |
- &O&DE Greyscale 11.36 |
- &O95.3% sRGB (Argyll) 60.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll) Gamma: 2.12
17.3, Asus GL771JW-T7082H17.3, 17.3, 17.3, 17.3,
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *45.637 19%58 -27% Response Time Black / White *25.620 22%28 -9% PWM Frequency980.4Brightness183333 82%246 34%303 66%326 78%Brightness Distribution7992 16%80 1%85 8%88 11%Black Level *0.2470.38 -54%0.2 19%0.26 -5%0.32 -30%Contrast788903 15%1275 62%1296 64%1081 37%Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *11.447 39%10.01 12%5.92 48%4.01 65%Greyscale DeltaE2000 *11.364.33 62%10.5 8%7.55 34%3.58 68%Gamma2.12 113%2.12 113%2.25 107%2.42 99%2.23 108%CCT12948 50%6111 106%12631 51%7270 89%6426 101%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)60.859 -3%62 2%56 -8%Color Space (Percent of sRGB)95.394 -1%85 -11%* ... smaller is better
Display Response TimesDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.&&&&&&& Response Time Black to White25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined&# ms rise&# ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. & 40&% of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.8 ms).&&&&&&& Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined&# ms rise↘ 22 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 250 (maximum) ms. & 65&% of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.2 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 980.4 Hz99&% brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 980.4&Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99&%
and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.The frequency of 980.4&Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.In comparison: 58&% of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 497 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 10420) Hz was measured.
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
144 Points &78%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
166 Points &90% +15%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPLGeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
144 Points &78% 0%
Eurocom Shark 4GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
136 Points &74% -6%
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
125 Points &68% -13%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
683 Points &44%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
865 Points &56% +27%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPLGeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
719 Points &46% +5%
Eurocom Shark 4GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
596 Points &38% -13%
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
490 Points &32% -28%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
1.58 Points &6%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
1.91 Points &7% +21%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPLGeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1.68 Points &6% +6%
Eurocom Shark 4GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
1.59 Points &6% +1%
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
1.46 Points &5% -8%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
7.52 Points &10%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
9.56 Points &13% +27%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPLGeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
7.96 Points &11% +6%
Eurocom Shark 4GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
6.45 Points &9% -14%
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
5.29 Points &7% -30%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
230.455 s *
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
178.464 s *
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPLGeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
206.294 s *
Eurocom Shark 4GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
246.964 s *
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
551.698 Seconds *
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
498.33 Seconds *
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPLGeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
573.691 Seconds *
Eurocom Shark 4GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
545.423 Seconds *
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
569.349 Seconds *
* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit6813 Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit20439 Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit5521 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit46.56 fpsCinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit7.52 PointsCinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit1.58 PointsCinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit54.53 fpsCinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit683 PointsCinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit144 PointsHelp&&&...&6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M681&5700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M682&6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M682MSI GL72 6QF
&6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M683&6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M684&5700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M694&6820HQ, Quadro M3000M699&&&...
&6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)875
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
5090 Points &83%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4660 Points &76% -8%
Asus GL771JW-T7082HGeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
4980 Points &81% -2%
MSI GE72-6QF8H11GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
5009 Points &82% -2%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
4734 Points &55%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
4810 Points &56% +2%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4320 Points &51% -9%
Asus GL771JW-T7082HGeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
4555 Points &53% -4%
MSI GE72-6QF8H11GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
4371 Points &51% -8%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
3903 Points &69%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3880 Points &68% -1%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
3751 Points &66% -4%
Asus GL771JW-T7082HGeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
3758 Points &66% -4%
MSI GE72-6QF8H11GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
3633 Points &64% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v23903&pointsPCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v24734&pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v25090&pointsHelp
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMeAsus GL771JW-T7082HGeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGLMSI GE72-6QF8H11GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NUGeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0) Copy Game MB/s1140.04749.83 -34%267.3 -77%265.39 -77%1209.49 6% Copy Program MB/s491.06372.7 -24%163.4 -67%170.08 -65%542.98 11% Copy ISO MB/s1519.7749.1 -51%315.3 -79%339.24 -78%1943.93 28% Score Total23401177 -50%892 -62%769 -67%2568 10% Score Write501354 -29%262 -48%285 -43%688 37% Score Read1248553 -56%424 -66%322 -74%1281 3% Access Time Write *0.0320.06 -88%0.06 -88%0.188 -488%0.039 -22% Access Time Read *0.040.085 -113%0.17 -325%0.111 -178%0.051 -28% 4K-64 Write296.41216.2 -27%161 -46%218.48 -26%462.56 56% 4K-64 Read998.17418.96 -58%352 -65%258.95 -74%983.86 -1% 4K Write115.1865.11 -43%70.8 -39%33.45 -71%97.82 -15% 4K Read46.3823.79 -49%21 -55%15.09 -67%42.98 -7% Seq Write897.33727.84 -19%458.1 -49%332.92 -63%1279.19 43% Seq Read2038.641107.09 -46%508.7 -75%483.58 -76%2543.81 25%* ... smaller is better
Transfer Rate Minimum:
1012.5 MB/sTransfer Rate Maximum:
1090.5 MB/sTransfer Rate Average:
1082.9 MB/sAccess Time:
0 msBurst Rate:
309 MB/sCPU Usage:
Sequential Read:
2217 MB/sSequential Write:
949.7 MB/s512K Read:
938 MB/s512K Write:
719.4 MB/s4K Read:
51.93 MB/s4K Write:
149.7 MB/s4K QD32 Read:
633.8 MB/s4K QD32 Write:
322.1 MB/s
Sequential Read:
2038.64 MB/sSequential Write:
897.33 MB/s4K Read:
46.38 MB/s4K Write:
115.18 MB/s4K-64 Read:
998.17 MB/s4K-64 Write:
296.41 MB/sAccess Time Read:
0.04 msAccess Time Write:
0.032 msCopy ISO:
1519.7 MB/sCopy Program:
491.06 MB/sCopy Game:
1140.04 MB/sScore Read:
1248 PointsScore Write:
501 PointsScore Total:
2340 Points
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
5861 Points &50%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
10625 Points &91% +81%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8099 Points &70% +38%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5439 Points &47% -7%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3682 Points &32% -37%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1801 Points &15% -69%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
9099 Points &69%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
11011 Points &83% +21%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8717 Points &66% -4%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8464 Points &64% -7%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
6776 Points &51% -26%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3738 Points &28% -59%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
5825 Points &11%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
12967 Points &25% +123%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
9615 Points &19% +65%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5220 Points &10% -10%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
4457 Points &9% -23%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2366 Points &5% -59%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
6161 Points &24%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
12364 Points &49% +101%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
9297 Points &37% +51%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5562 Points &22% -10%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
4596 Points &18% -25%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2423 Points &10% -61%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
1804 Points &23%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
3748 Points &48% +108%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
2737 Points &35% +52%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
1678 Points &21% -7%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
1033 Points &13% -43%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
462 Points &6% -74%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
9655 Points &58%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
12752 Points &77% +32%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
9800 Points &59% +2%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
9559 Points &58% -1%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
9499 Points &57% -2%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3937 Points &24% -59%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
4705 Points &12%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
9963 Points &25% +112%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
7335 Points &19% +56%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4290 Points &11% -9%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3174 Points &8% -33%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1589 Points &4% -66%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
4340 Points &19%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
8793 Points &38% +103%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
6489 Points &28% +50%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3998 Points &17% -8%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
2866 Points &12% -34%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1376 Points &6% -68%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
6805 Points &17%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
9187 Points &23% +35%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
6934 Points &18% +2%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
7057 Points &18% +4%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
6747 Points &17% -1%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2745 Points &7% -60%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
33474 Points &20%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
62938 Points &39% +88%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
46213 Points &28% +38%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
25748 Points &16% -23%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
21500 Points &13% -36%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
8549 Points &5% -74%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
17891 Points &51%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
27362 Points &78% +53%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
20458 Points &58% +14%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
16208 Points &46% -9%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
14469 Points &41% -19%
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
5816 Points &17% -67%
3DMark 11 Performance6161&points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score94088&points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score17891&points3DMark Fire Strike Score4340&points3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score2169&pointsHelp&&&...&6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M5775&3630QM, GeForce GTX 680M5804&6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M6110MSI GL72 6QF
&6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M6161&3630QM, GeForce GTX 670MX SLI6459&4710HQ, GeForce GTX 870M7089&4930MX, GeForce GTX 780M7900&&&...
&6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)22627
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
51.6 fps &100% +102%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
37.1 fps &72% +45%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
25.6 fps &50%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
21.2 fps &41% -17%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
60.4 fps &100% +75%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
44.6 fps &74% +29%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
34.6 fps &57%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
23.8 fps &39% -31%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
21 fps &35% -39%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
92.4 fps &100% +85%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
69.7 fps &75% +40%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
49.9 fps &54%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
44.1 fps &48% -12%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
27.7 fps &30% -44%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
205.5 fps &100% +71%
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
133.1 fps &65% +11%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
120.2 fps &58%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
106.9 fps &52% -11%
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
84.3 fps &41% -30%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
70.6 fps &100% +106%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
34.3 fps &49%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
30.9 fps &44% -10%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
125.8 fps &100% +59%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
79 fps &63%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
55.7 fps &44% -29%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
59.7 fps &100% +126%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
26.4 fps &44%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
24.2 fps &41% -8%
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
73.8 fps &100% +120%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
33.6 fps &46%
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
31 fps &42% -8%
ultra (2013) 133.5120.249.9fps
(2013) 109.47934.3fps
(2014) 69.358.829.7fps
(2015) 6533fps
(2015) 59.233.626.4fps
(2016) 64.834.625.6fps
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMeAsus G771JM-T7025HGeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTSE630MSI GE72-6QF8H11GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NUGeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100HLenovo Ideapad Y700-17 80QK7709PBGeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GBIdle Minimum *35.330.9 12%30 15%32 9%32.6 8%31.4 11%Idle Average *35.431.3 12%30.2 15%33 7%32.6 8%31.4 11%Idle Maximum *35.432.3 9%33 7%37 -5%33.4 6%34.3 3%Load Average *40.937.3 9%40.4 1%44 -8%36.5 11%41.3 -1%Load Maximum *4539.5 12%46.2 -3%49 -9%48 -7%44 2%* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
35.3 / 35.4 / 35.4 dB(A)DVD
40.9 / 45 dB(A)
&&30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: &&&BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)&&&environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
&43 &C47.2 &C42.8 &C&&37.6 &C46.4 &C29.8 &C&&32.2 &C38.6 &C24 &C&
Maximum: 47.2 &CAverage: 38 &C
45.4 &C42 &C49 &C24.8 &C30.2 &C34.4 &C25.2 &C28.6 &C31.8 &C
Maximum: 49 &CAverage: 34.6 &C Power Supply (max.)& 45.4 &C | Room Temperature&20 &C
| Fluke 62 Mini IR ThermometerIdle
&24.8 &C24.8 &C22.8 &C&&25.2 &C25 &C21.6 &C&&25.8 &C28.4 &C21.4 &C&
Maximum: 28.4 &CAverage: 24.4 &C
23.4 &C22.2 &C25.8 &C21.6 &C23.4 &C26.8 &C21.6 &C24.4 &C25.8 &C
Maximum: 26.8 &CAverage: 23.9 &C Room Temperature&20 &C
| Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMeAsus GL771JW-T7082HGeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGLMSI GE72-6QF8H11GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NUGeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100HLenovo Ideapad Y700-17 80QK7709PBGeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GBIdle Minimum *22.18.8 60%16.7 24%11 50%5.8 74%4.3 81%Idle Average *28.314.8 48%23 19%17 40%9 68%13.8 51%Idle Maximum *29.824.3 18%31.7 -6%22 26%14.7 51%19.8 34%Load Average *8788.8 -2%97.4 -12%96 -10%85 2%115.9 -33%Load Maximum *134.1111.2 17%141.4 -5%164 -22%121.5 9%123.5 8%* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.74 / 1.28 WattIdle 22.1 / 28.3 / 29.8 Watt
87 / 134.1 Watt
max: &&&&&&&&Metrahit Energy
43 WhAsus GL771JW-T7082H 56 WhMSI GE72-6QF8H11 51 Wh 88 Wh 53 Wh 60 WhReader / Idle238601 153%403 69%702 195%410 72%688 189%Load6178 28%49 -20%109 79%96 57%91 49%WiFiWiFi v1.3107271 153%154 44%358 235%254 137%334 212%
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
WiFi Surfing v1.3
Load (maximum brightness)
Pro+ 负载下处理器温度低
+ 处理器和显卡性能高
+ 考虑到配置售价实惠
+ 相对易于维护升级
+ USB 3.1 第一代C型接口
+ 模块化光驱
+ sRGB色域覆盖广
+ NVMe固态硬盘Cons- 无独立低音炮;低频还原差
- 出厂屏幕偏蓝
- 无原生Thunderbolt 3支持
- 运行中键盘和触控版部分温度高
- 屏幕亮度低
- 键盘无背光
- 电池续航短
- 无可选的IPS屏幕配置
- 风扇噪音大
In review: MSI GL72 6QF. Test model provided by Xotic PC.
微星GL72的最大优势在于仅1000美元(约6502人民币)的起售价。它带给用户的是强劲的酷睿i7-6700HQ处理器,GTX 960M显卡,NVMe固态硬盘,模块光驱,和易于维护升级的内部构造。它的性能和处理器温度控制都十分出色,可以适合全高清运行最新游戏,同时显卡可以通过微星Afterburner超频。
不过它节省成本的地方也十分明显。除了没有键盘背光,屏幕的背光也较暗,同时TN面板需要重新校准色彩。它的扬声器严重缺少低频,电池续航即使对于游戏本来说也非常短。它的风扇噪音较大,即使是在低负载时也能明显听到,显卡和处理器均为板载所以无法升级。它的机身较厚,在设计上较为过时。如果你的预算较为紧张,那么GL72的优秀游戏性能依然值得考虑。除此之外,它的系统噪音较大,同时电池续航有限,户外实用性也较差。注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击。&
MSI GL72 6QF - 03/16/2016
v5Allen NgoChassis72&/&98&&&73%Keyboard79%Pointing Device81%Connectivity78&/&81&&&96%Weight58&/&66&&&86%Battery59%Display76%Games Performance86%Application Performance94%Temperature89&/&95&&&94%Noise70&/&90&&&78%Audio50%Average74%80%Gaming - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
微星 GL72 6QF Xotic PC Edition 笔记本电脑简短评测 Allen Ngo,&&(Update:&)}

我要回帖

更多关于 mq02abd100h 评测 的文章

更多推荐

版权声明:文章内容来源于网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请点击这里与我们联系,我们将及时删除。

点击添加站长微信