愤怒的小鸟小游戏合集
您所在的位置：&&
《愤怒的小鸟合集》
小游戏合集简介
愤怒的小鸟开始兴起于iPhone APP Store上，其简单的玩法，多变的结局和可爱的卡通形象，迅速和《植物大战僵尸》同成为玩家最喜欢的休闲小游戏。3366愤怒的小鸟小游戏合集让你玩到各种不同玩法不同版本的愤怒的小鸟小游戏，一起感受快乐，分享趣味！
全部小游戏合集
更多愤怒的小鸟小游戏
推荐小游戏音乐游戏是一种跟随背景音乐的节奏和屏幕上的指示，在正确的时间输入操作以获得分数的游戏类型。现代意义上的音乐游戏始于1996年…阅读全文关注话题分享
阅读全文5.4K603 条评论分享收藏阅读全文85380 条评论分享收藏感谢阅读全文473112 条评论分享收藏
阅读全文385280 条评论分享收藏感谢阅读全文37558 条评论分享收藏3,982安卓泡泡龙游戏大全
想象一下你现在处在一个绚丽多彩、五颜六色的世界里，这个世界中充满了彩幻的泡泡龙，这样的世界似乎是在童话故事里才会出现！现在就让我们带你去感受一下那充满彩色气息的天空，去感受那美轮美奂的泡泡龙世界吧！在这里你将随着那彩色的泡泡龙翩翩起舞！
简介：开心泡泡龙1000关是一款泡泡龙游戏，游戏为玩家设置了多个关卡可供挑战，超靠后的关卡通关越难，极其有挑战性，有些关卡确实不是所有玩家都可以过
大小：34MB
简介：愤怒的小鸟泡泡大战破解版是一款基于物理弹射玩法的全新泡泡龙游戏！游戏打造愤怒的小鸟系列全新作品！游戏延续了经典泡泡龙游戏的物理弹射玩法，在其
大小：138MB
简介：全民泡泡大战修改版是一款类似于泡泡龙玩法的益智休闲游戏，全面升级了泡泡龙的经典模式，强力角色搭配超多萌宠，让玩家在闯关冒险和无限挑战中享受奇
大小：29MB
简介：BubbleDream是一款趣味十足的泡泡龙小游戏，相信玩家都喜欢泡泡龙玩法的游戏的哦，简单有趣的可爱泡泡等你来挑战！...
简介：果瓜泡泡龙是一款简单有趣的基于水果泡泡龙玩法的休闲益智小游戏，游戏十分小巧精致，可口而新鲜的水果等你来品尝，快来下载玩耍体验吧！...
简介：糖果萌熊爱泡泡是一款基于泡泡龙消除玩法的休闲手机游戏，游戏非常简单有趣，喜欢的小伙伴一定不要错过了哦，快来下载玩耍体验一番吧！...
简介：BiuBiuBoom是一款简单有趣的益智休闲类的小游戏，游戏十分可爱，小巧精致的游戏画风，喜欢的小伙伴就来下载玩耍体验一下吧！...
简介：泡泡熊貓是一款简单有趣的益智休闲泡泡龙玩法的小小，游戏十分经典，可爱的画风等你来体验，喜欢的小伙伴一定不要错过哦！...
简介：小羊泡泡萌是一款基于可爱消除风格的休闲手机游戏，游戏非常小巧精致，玩法简单易上手，老少咸宜，小清新的画面，挑战不断，刺激连连，快来下载玩耍吧...
简介：愤怒的小鸟泡泡版是一款给你让你与宠物一起并肩作战的泡泡龙消除游戏，游戏中你可以体验到无限连消畅快淋漓的体验，赶紧来加入体验！ 在游戏中，点击...
简介：爆破泡泡龙是一款画面非常简洁清新以泡泡龙为题材的趣味射击消除类益智游戏，在游戏中玩家需要控制泡泡的射击，将相同的泡泡消除来完成关卡任务。游戏...
大小：13MB
简介：猪泡泡射手是一款简单有趣的泡泡龙玩法的可爱休闲手机游戏，游戏中小猪想要打泡泡，快来帮助小猪吧，快来下载玩耍体验吧！...
简介：泡泡龙:海底狂舞是一款非常不错的海洋题材的泡泡龙消除玩法的休闲手机游戏，游戏中有着简单的趣味的玩法，喜欢的小伙伴就来下载玩耍体验吧！...
简介：疯狂泡泡龙加强版是一款简单有趣的基于泡泡龙玩法的消除类的小游戏，游戏十分简单易上手，玩法甚是疯狂，喜欢的小伙伴就来下载玩耍体验吧！...
大小：25MB
简介：熊小米泡泡大战破解版是一款炫酷画面让你爱不释手的萌系卡通风格的益智类泡泡龙游戏，游戏中将会有各种神奇传送门等你来穿越，让你怒斩BOSS！...
大小：28672MB
简介：泡泡龙亚特兰蒂斯2是一款画面非常精美华丽带有卡通风格的休闲消除类游戏，在游戏中玩家需要控制发射泡泡去完成一系列的消除任务。该款游戏中拥有全新...
简介：萌猫：泡泡射击（Kitty Pawp: Bubble Shooter）是一款画面非常精美清新带有Q萌卡通风格以喵星人为题材的趣味泡泡龙消除类...
简介：消除泡泡龙是一款不容错过的泡泡龙消除玩法的休闲手机游戏，游戏中有着经典而易上手的玩法，喜欢的玩家就来下载玩耍吧！...
大小：41MB
简介：泡泡咕咕（Bubble CoCo）是一款以经典童话故事为背景的点击类泡泡龙游戏，游戏中你将与狡猾的狐狸先生对抗，将可怜的小鸡们全部拯救出来，...
大小：54MB
简介：泡泡英雄传是一款画面非常精美清新以泡泡龙玩法为题材的趣味英雄闯关类游戏，在游戏中玩家需要通过消除来控制英雄完成闯关任务。游戏的画面精美、玩法...
大小：28MB
简介：泡泡魔法是一款画面非常精美以各种颜色的泡泡为题材的益智类消除游戏，在游戏中玩家需要控制泡泡去完成消除任务。游戏让人爱不释手的新型泡泡龙游戏！...
大小：42MB
简介：胖达泡泡龙（Panda Pop）是一款萌系卡通风格的泡泡龙消除游戏，这款游戏为玩家提供了不同难度的挑战关卡，这绝对是款适合打发时间的游戏哦！...
大小：18MB
简介：泡泡龙街机版（Bubble Shooter Arcade）是一款画面非常精美清新以泡泡龙为题材的趣味街机消除类休闲游戏，在游戏中玩家需要通过...
大小：45MB
简介：童话泡沫射击破解版（バブルメア）是一款带你穿越进入到童话世界中的萌系风格的泡泡龙射击手游，本作的画风十分的梦幻卡通，在这里你可以与童话人物一...
简介：泡泡龙之天空大作战是一款画面非常精美华丽带有卡通风格的趣味泡泡龙消除游戏，在游戏中玩家需要控制泡泡龙去完成一系列的消除任务。可爱的画风，经典...
大小：12MB
简介：泡泡萌萌消2015破解版是一款经典玩法好玩的让你根本停不下来的泡泡龙消除手机游戏，游戏中将会有各种不一样的玩法和挑战，在等着你，喜欢就赶紧来...
大小：45MB
简介：泡泡玛丽破解版（バブルメア）是一款带你进入到童话世界中进行冒险的泡泡龙消除手游，游戏中将会有各种萌系卡通的人物等你来挑选，赶紧来加入到这个行...
简介：加菲猫泡泡大乱斗破解版是一款集轻松益智，可爱休闲于一身的消磨时间必备小游戏。玩家需要一定的技巧来应付游戏中的不同挑战，从而通过关卡。 融合了...
简介：农场泡泡龙游戏是一款画面非常精美清新以农场为背景的经典泡泡龙消除类游戏，在游戏中玩家需要控制泡泡龙的射击去完成一系列的消除任务。游戏的玩法基...
大小：38MB
简介：绿林大冒险泡泡世界是一款简单的休闲泡泡龙题材的消除类手机游戏，游戏中玩家将会体验到十分简单的玩法，明确的游戏目标，轻松惬意的游戏氛围，怎能错...
大小：20MB
简介：泡泡能手是一款画面非常精美清新以泡泡龙为题材的趣味益智类消除游戏，在游戏中玩家需要控制发射泡泡去完成一系列的消除任务。游戏中玩家需要做的就是...
大小：21MB
简介：魔法泡泡龙2破解版是一款简单的休闲泡泡龙题材的手机游戏，游戏中玩家将会体验到十分简单有趣的细线消除玩法，喜欢泡泡龙的小伙伴不妨来下载玩耍吧！...
大小：33MB
简介：课间泡泡龙是一款简单的泡泡龙题材的休闲手机游戏，游戏中全是Q版的界面，老少咸宜，刺激多多，喜欢的小伙伴就来下载玩耍体验一番吧！...
简介：威尔伯是一款经典好玩的消除类手机游戏，游戏中融入了西方魔法元素，玩家需要依靠自己聪明的头脑完成一系列消除挑战，完成游戏关卡。 帮助善良的女巫...
大小：24MB
简介：海盗泡沫是一款基于简单的休闲消除泡泡龙玩法的手机游戏，游戏中的画面十分简单干净，给人一种十分清爽的感觉，老少咸宜，十分适合打发时间！...
简介：一起泡泡龙是一款有着卡通童趣画面的休闲游戏，在游戏中玩家要做的就是凭借自己的思维能力发射出各色小球来消除相同颜色的小球，全部消除则能够通过关...
大小：41MB
简介：海豚泡泡龙游戏（Bubble Bubble BOTO）是一款非常休闲的掌上泡泡龙消除游戏，适合各个年龄段人玩耍哦，打发时间的不二选择，喜欢消...
大小：41MB
简介：海豚泡泡龙破解版（ Bubble Bubble BOTO）是一款极其容易上瘾的掌上休闲游戏哦，玩法类似于消消乐哦，非常流行的消除游戏哦，感兴...
大小：10MB
简介：狗狗海洋奇遇记(Bubble Dog Marine Aduenture)是一款经典有趣的泡泡龙游戏。海洋霸主把船长掳走了，狗狗为了救出船长，...
简介：全民泡友是一款休闲的扔泡泡消除类游戏，史上最华丽，最流畅的泡泡龙游戏火热来袭，喜欢扔泡泡的朋友不要错过!玩法简单休闲，只需3个相同颜色的泡泡...
简介：开心泡泡龙修改版是一款休闲类泡泡龙游戏，永恒的记忆，永远的泡泡龙，80后玩家一定不会陌生，这款简单有好玩的消除小游戏带给许多人美好的记忆，开...
大小：33MB
简介：泡泡粉碎（Bubble Smasher - Pop Bubbles）是一款非常容易上瘾的气泡弹出的休闲游戏，非常棘手的泡泡，他们看上去非常的...
简介：豪华泡泡龙，童话一般的游戏画面，各种新奇道具让你欲罢不能，豪华的游戏，不一样的玩法，一切都在豪华泡泡龙，童话之旅由此开始...
大小：15MB
简介：魔法口袋的秘密安卓版是一款泡泡龙类益智消除游戏。魔法口袋的秘密游戏点评：1、这款游戏的操作非常的简单，且容易上手，游戏目标就是消除画面中同色...
大小：11MB
简介：吹泡泡是一款非常有趣的休闲游戏，游戏中我们需要把泡泡吹到指定的地方。游戏关卡设计非常巧妙，吹泡泡的过程不会一帆风顺。游戏看似简单，却又充满了...
大小：16MB
简介：圣诞节游戏:泡泡射击是一款泡泡龙类休闲娱乐游戏。游戏充满了浓浓的圣诞气息，让你充分感受到节日的欢乐。游戏玩法简单，射击相同颜色的泡泡即可消除...
大小：33MB
简介：全民泡僵尸是一款史上最难的泡泡龙类消除手游，在游戏中你需要在消除泡泡的同时，帮助人类摆脱僵尸的追杀，游戏集宠物强化养成、武器弹药升级、跨屏操...
简介：泡泡世界是一个泡沫游戏，但发挥它的方式是不同的。用来消除在屏幕上的所有的气泡，并得到香蕉的气泡的数目是具体的。水平似乎很容易，来赢得3星级。...
简介：泡泡龙梦游仙境是一款让所有人着迷，爱不释手的经典泡泡龙游戏。游戏中增加了独有的BOSS战斗，每个场景都有独特的守护者。 打BOSS，秀操作，...
简介：泡泡龙奇幻星球是一款经典消除类休闲游戏！征服公主，探索星球，打boss，泡泡龙游戏还能这么玩！经典模式中增加守关BOSS，打败超强的星球守护...
大小：46MB
简介：泡泡龙射击是一款好玩的泡泡龙休闲游戏。轻松的，益智的，愉悦的。轻轻松松玩游戏，选择适合自己的游戏，简单多一点，快乐多一点。游戏中你需要一定的...
大小：47MB
简介：泡泡射手银河防御（Bubble Mania Galaxy Defense）是一款了不起的射击泡泡游戏，游戏中有600个关卡。在这款游戏中玩家...
大小：35MB
简介：阿拉伯之夜:泡泡射击（Arabian Nights:Bubble Shooter）是一款结合了泡泡龙以及弹球玩法的休闲游戏。游戏充满了神秘色...
简介：泡泡龙战记是一款结合了传统竞技类泡泡龙的经典玩法和三消休闲游戏的创新玩法的游戏。在这款游戏中有冰冻、迷雾、诅咒、毒液等多种特殊的泡泡，精心设...
简介：泡泡鸟射击（Bird Bubble Shooter）是一款画面非常Q萌可爱的泡泡龙类益智游戏。在游戏中点击屏幕发射泡泡，使三个或以上相同颜色...
简介：泡泡总动员加强版是一款泡泡龙类休闲游戏，有史以来最为精致的泡泡消除游戏，让你欲罢不能。是不是已经让您爱不释手了呢？但是您是否也同时感觉到以前...
简介：泡泡龙:3D大冒险是一款休闲消除游戏，放下压力，一起DUANG！精美3D清新泡泡！百个关卡挑战脑力！最3D最认真最没节操（误~）的泡泡龙游戏...
大小：14MB
简介：萌萌泡泡熊是一款画风非常萌萌哒的泡泡龙游戏，画面精美清新、上手简单、百变关卡延续了20年来不变的泡泡龙基础玩法的同时又对游戏进行了创新改造，...
大小：10MB
简介：圣诞泡泡（Christmas Bubble）是一款休闲类泡泡龙游戏。游戏的玩法很简单，你只需要控制屏幕中可爱的小女孩，让她把小球丢到相同颜色...
大小：45MB
简介：愤怒的小鸟思黛拉泡泡（Stella POP!）是一款休闲益智游戏。全新、超过瘾的益智游戏， Angry Birds 打泡泡游戏!拿起弹弓，匹...
大小：804KB
简介：情人泡泡龙是一款经典简单的泡泡龙游戏，小男孩和小女孩需要消除所有的气泡，不要让你的伴侣失望哦。游戏方法：点击指示射击泡泡的方向；通过不同的组...
简介：泡泡大作战加强版是一款超可爱的泡泡龙游戏！每个泡泡颜色艳丽、特效丰富、音乐休闲动听。游戏拥有有几十种关卡，让你爽个不停。更有丰富的每日登录奖...
简介：元素魔法弹是一款非常经典的泡泡龙射击游戏。可以轻松上手，游戏是很容易掌握，锻炼你的技巧和眼力，消除尽可能多的泡泡赢得高分。...
简介：泡泡龙菜菜闯天关一款经典的泡泡龙游戏，让菜菜控制大炮，射出泡泡，3个相同颜色的泡泡碰在一起就可消除。通过您的巧妙安排，摘取钥匙，勇斗BOSS...
大小：14MB
简介：拯救大萌宠是一款非常有创意的泡泡龙系列手游，绚丽的音效，精致的画面，巨额的分数奖励，过关的喜悦，充斥着游戏的始终;更有全新解锁模式。 ...
大小：10MB
简介：愤怒老太泡泡射击是一款简单的类似泡泡龙的消除类休闲游戏，在游戏中玩家控制老太太进行泡泡射击，相同颜色的泡泡就会消除。通过方便的控制只需要瞄准...
大小：25MB
简介：泡泡龙亚特兰蒂斯2金币版是一款全新设计BOSS登场的绚丽特效的泡泡龙消除游戏！游戏在延续前作的基础上，加入了众多全新元素，和来自全国的小伙伴...
大小：11MB
简介：泡泡龙喜气羊羊是一款超越经典的让人着迷的泡泡龙游戏。这里不仅有独特的守护场景的BOSS，更有萌萌的小宠物。打BOSS、养宠物；细腻的操作、智...
大小：62MB
简介：小王子泡泡（The Little Prince）是一款玩法类似于泡泡龙的经典消除类手机游戏。游戏中积极乐观的王子为了收集散落在各地的徽章，踏...
大小：10MB
简介：智美泡泡龙是一创新的经典益智类精品手机游戏，游戏花样多，每日转转乐，转一转。好礼送不停。一样的泡泡龙，不一样游戏体验，玩家通过点击屏幕发射泡...
简介：泡泡龙千关畅玩版是一款画面非常萌萌哒的经典类泡泡龙游戏，游戏中让超萌美女控制大炮，射出泡泡，3个相同颜色的泡泡碰在一起就可消除。通过您的巧妙...
大小：38MB
简介：魔法小精灵大冒险(Magimon Adventures)是一款动感十足、结合角色扮演及宝石射击玩法的休闲游戏，进入怪物与驯兽师的奇妙世界。游...
简介：消灭五彩泡是一款非常绚丽多彩的、非常易上手的泡泡龙消除类游戏，只需点击两个或两个以上颜色相同的泡泡即可消除。相连数越多越好，最后如果泡泡剩余...
简介：神玛泡泡消消乐是一款经典的以泡泡为题材的消除类休闲游戏,在游戏中玩家需要将相同颜色的泡泡消除掉。非常适合打发零碎时间的休闲游戏。游戏玩法非常...
大小：28MB
简介：泡泡龙亚特兰蒂斯2是一款休闲类的消除游戏。 泡泡龙亚特兰蒂斯2(paopaolong)游戏介绍： 8000万粉丝选择的超人气泡泡龙游戏，全新...
大小：11MB
简介：糖逗豆是一款以糖果为主角的泡泡龙消除游戏，画面可爱精美，新式旋转打豆豆乐趣无穷，无聊闲暇时打发时间的最好选择。 游戏中连接同色小球大于等于3...
简介：雨林泡泡龙是一款风格清新的泡泡龙类的休闲游戏，在游戏中玩家需要将相同颜色的泡泡消除掉以得分。游戏的玩法也很容易，只需要点击彩球发射，射中相同...
简介：武士打泡泡是一款拥有多种挑战模式的泡泡龙消除类手游！游戏的画面清新可爱，音效迷人，玩法简单，轻松上手的游戏。达到一定分数即可过关。集轻松益智...
大小：45MB
简介：可可泡泡龙（Bubble CoCo）是一款非常萌萌哒的泡泡龙消除游戏，游戏的画面非常的精美卡哇伊，看着这些萌萌的鸡仔们小编都忍不住的想玩两把...
大小：10MB
简介：蜡笔小新泡泡龙破解版是一款画面效果精美以经典动漫蜡笔小新为题材的泡泡龙消除类游戏，在游戏中玩家需要把相同颜色的泡泡射击到一起完成消除，以此来...
简介：泡泡射击是一款玩法类似于泡泡龙的消除类休闲游戏，在游戏中玩家需要将相同颜色的泡泡消除掉。使3个或更多的气泡组合，使他们迸发。最好是当你发现超...
大小：16MB
简介：冒险果园是一款经典泡泡龙休闲游戏，画面上的小泡泡极为可爱，活泼的小音乐烘托气氛，以及各种不同的背景关卡，玩到根本停不下来，是闲暇时打发时间的...
大小：21MB
简介：水果泡泡萌Q版是一款让你疯狂消除的休闲类游戏，游戏中会有激萌松鼠萌宠伙伴助你通关哦！有着高清绚丽水果爆炸特效的Q版泡泡龙消除类手机游戏，在泡...
简介：泡泡龙5是一款经典复刻的泡泡龙游戏，250+精心设计的关卡满足你挑战的乐趣。绝对创新的、游戏迷必玩的泡泡龙游戏.每25关将会遇到一强力Bos...
简介：欢乐泡泡喵是一款消除类休闲益智小游戏,游戏画面卡通可爱,玩法是最经典的泡泡龙游戏模式,更多的关卡,以及梦幻的场景,一定会让你喜欢上这款游戏 ...
简介：果汁爆破破解版是一款创意百关花样挑战的泡泡龙类消除手机游戏，游戏中将会有众多的海量福利，帮助你欢乐通关，还有各种激萌的松鼠小伙伴再陪你一起快...
大小：28MB
简介：泡泡美人鱼是一款百万玩家首选的泡泡龙消除游戏，游戏中你将深入到奇幻的海洋世界中去探索发现神奇的食物，游戏中海油多样的玩法模式经典、消除、旋转...
大小：14MB
简介：一款令人着迷的泡泡龙游戏。在经典的游戏模式中增加了独有的BOSS战，每个场景都 有独特的守护者等待你的挑战。多种多样的奇趣道具供你使用。打B...
大小：26MB
简介：泡泡维京传是一款给你无限挑战模式的泡泡龙消除类手机游戏，游戏的画面有点怀旧的感觉，玩法非常的简单只要将同款颜色的泡泡进行消除即可！ ...
简介：射击泡沫是一款画面非常简洁清新以泡沫为题材的射击消除类游戏，在游戏中玩家需要通过射击方向将相同颜色的泡沫消除来完成游戏任务。游戏中相同颜色的...
大小：15MB
简介：泡泡龙西游鸡是一款画面非常精美清新可爱的泡泡龙系列益智类消除游戏，在游戏中玩家需要通过发射颜色相同的泡泡将其消除来完成游戏任务，解锁更多的关...
简介：泡泡龙消除是一款画面非常精美色彩丰富的泡泡龙益智类消除游戏，在游戏中玩家需要控制发射泡泡去消除颜色相同的泡泡，完成游戏中所有的关卡。经典的泡...
简介：脑筋急转弯:泡泡乐是一款休闲益智类手机游戏，游戏以同名动画电影《脑筋急转弯》为蓝本精心打造，以经典的泡泡龙为核心，并重现电影《脑筋急转弯》的...
大小：18MB
简介：泡泡龙之宠物精灵是一款百搭泡泡随意消、同色泡泡全不见的益智类消除游戏！媲美开心消消乐的策略版泡泡龙登场啦，还有可爱的神奇宝贝们助阵！ 游戏中...
大小：21MB
简介：梦幻泡泡射击（Bubble Adventure）是一款让你在色彩斑斓的泡泡中收缩自如的消除类休闲游戏。游戏的玩法与泡泡龙类似，但是其中又增添...
大小：10MB
简介：泡泡龙之海底奇缘是一款Q版的消除休闲游戏，游戏画面精美，色彩多样，关卡丰富，更有星级挑战。 手中执剑方能保护珍惜之人,数千年的宿命与恩怨,终...
大小：20MB
简介：TFboys泡泡龙是一款经典的泡泡龙消除游戏，游戏是为TFboys粉丝量身定做，游戏中的消除元素全部换成了TFboys的Q版头像，粉丝们快来...
大小：18MB
简介：泡沫疯狂是一款以外太空为背景的泡泡龙消除类手游，本作是绝对免费的，而且游戏的每一个关卡设计都是惟妙惟肖。 在游戏中你需要滑动屏幕操控主角尽可...
简介：泡泡龙星球狂欢是一款每日签到必有丰富奖励等你来拿的泡泡龙消除游戏，本作是以经典外太空为背景的！游戏的画面非常精美，让人身处宇宙空间之中。 游...
大小：76MB
简介：土匪贝瑞2是一款非常具有趣味性的益智休闲类型的小游戏，游戏的玩法是非常经典的泡泡龙游戏，游戏中的画面缤纷斑斓，玩家在游戏中会体验到非常轻松休...
简介：泡泡岛2：世界之旅（Bubble Island 2: World Tour）破解版是一款画面十分可爱的休闲泡泡龙消除游戏，玩家将会在游戏中体...
简介：海盗泡泡龙大战这是一款休闲的泡泡龙游戏，游戏操作十分简单，通过发射不同颜色的小球，消除相同颜色的泡泡。 海盗泡泡龙大战是一款和泡泡龙大作战一...
大小：20MB
简介：松鼠泡泡传奇，以松鼠为主题的泡泡龙消除游戏，松鼠们都饿了，快来帮助它们消除泡泡获得坚果，让它们填饱肚子吧！ 超过160个梦幻般的水平，5可爱...
合集推荐Collections
CopyRight2004年-年 YXdown.Com 游迅网 All Rights Reserved
备案编号:沪ICP备号-9从认知角度分析《愤怒的小鸟》成功原因
发布时间： 12:19:35
Tags：,,,,
游戏邦注：本文原作者是Charles L. Mauro，原文发表于2011年2月，所涉数据均以当时为准。
常见问题：在人因工程（游戏邦注：也称为“可用性工程”）领域担任顾问30多年以来，有数百名客户问我为何用户不喜欢他们公司的软件。这个永久性问题的答案很复杂，但并非难以捉摸。解答问题需要经验和专业的可用性分析。
非常见问题：令人惊奇的是，很少有客户会提出相反的问题：为何某种界面会如此吸引玩家与之互动？这是个很麻烦的问题，因为需要用认知反向工程来解释成功界面中有何种从心理上吸引玩家体验的互动。当基于用户体验的设计使某些产品获得巨大成功时，这个问题就会浮现，此类产品有iPhone、iPad、Google即时搜索、任天堂Wii和微软Kinect等。
有趣的问题：近期有客户咨询取得非凡成功的《愤怒的小鸟》这款运行于手机、平板电脑及其他平台的休闲游戏相关情况。这里对该游戏做个简短的介绍，以为那些不甚了解《愤怒的小鸟》的人释疑解惑。玩家在游戏中将炮弹状的小鸟抛向脆弱的玻璃和由绿猪搭建的木屋，目标在于尽量熟练快速地用倒塌的木屋将绿猪砸死。这听起来显然像是个非常简单的概念，但确实引起了轰动。
为何会有超过5000万的用户下载如此简单的游戏呢？许多人还支付数美元甚至更多来购买高级版本。更令人惊奇的是，这款游戏不仅下载量巨大，全球用户每天在《愤怒的小鸟》上花费的总时间数将近2亿分钟，也就是说游戏每年吸引用户投入12亿小时的时间。相比之下，维基百科创立至今，人们创建和更新词条的总时间数为1亿小时（游戏邦注：该数据源于Neiman Journalism Lab）。我觉得《愤怒的小鸟》值得人们细心研究。为何这款看似简单的游戏会有如此大的吸引力呢？制作真正具有吸引力的软件体验比想象中要复杂得多，即便电脑游戏中最简单的方面也是如此。《愤怒的小鸟》成功获取用户体验背后潜藏着某些认知科学。
angry-birds(from slidetoplay.com)
简单却富有吸引力的互动概念：这一点看似很明显，但很少人意识到简单的互动模型在程序上并不简单。简单化指的是相对短暂的体验时间便能够让用户明白和完全接受界面的行为方式。这在技术上称为图式形成。在真正优秀的用户界面中，技能学习的重要阶段发生在称为“第一次用户体验”的特定使用周期期间。如果用户可以迅速构建完整的图式，他们通常会认为此用户界面“简单”。但是，简单不等同于富有吸引力。创造被用户视为“简单”的用户界面解决方案并不难，真正的挑战在于让用户产生持续与系统互动的欲望，我们将其称为用户的“参与度”。
时机恰当时为用户心智模式添加更多细节会让用户界面产生吸引力。《愤怒的小鸟》的简单互动模式很容易为用户知晓，用户很快便会就游戏的互动方法论、核心战略和得分过程形成心智模式。因为游戏细致安排了用户战略成分心智模式的扩展过程并逐渐增加问题及解决方案方法论，所以它富有吸引力，让用户沉迷其中。随着游戏关卡的复杂性逐渐增加，这些有着聪明行为的小鸟不断扩展用户的心智模式。创造简单、富有吸引力互动模式的过程就变得极为复杂。现在多数开发软件的组织认为只有《愤怒的小鸟》才能扩展用户的心智模式，其实你也可以做到。
精巧管理响应时间：用户界面设计的普遍原则是“响应时间越短越好”。对某些应用来说，这项原则确实是真理。比如，Google将此作为系统的黄金法则。但令人惊奇的是，少数软件开发商意识到响应时间管理可用来增加用户界面参与度的质量和深度。这个观点往往为人们所误解，但用户界面中不是每个层面都需要或应该尽量提速。多数程序员对此难以理解，只有少数游戏设计师会利用这个强大的变量。在大部分商业软件界面中，响应时间管理完全被忽略，甚至那些所谓的用户界面设计专家也不例外。《愤怒的小鸟》开发商以某种超乎“越快越好”原则的方式来管理响应时间。
比如在《愤怒的小鸟》中，程序员固然可以让小鸟的飞行速度变得很快，但他们没有这么做。他们反倒让那些愤怒的小鸟以悠闲的节奏飞翔，在空中划过一道弧线，然后撞向猪的玻璃屋。这种放慢的响应时间与细致勾勒的轨迹（游戏邦注：即小鸟飞行的路径）相结合，解决了所有用户界面面临的巨大问题——误差修正。大量软件用户界面都未曾考虑过系统体验能够以某种方式来教授用户改善其行为。这对基于屏幕的互动系统来说是个巨大且复杂的问题，误差修正不仅必要，而且还可能影响到整个软件。
在《愤怒的小鸟》的玩法中，猪也会在房子被撞塌一段时间后死亡。在某些游戏场景中，猪摇晃、滑落和滚下木板或被缓慢掉落的残骸砸死需要经过数秒钟的时间。3到5秒的响应时间在多数用户界面中会让用户感到恼怒，但《愤怒的小鸟》并未出现这种问题。而且，这种精致的响应时间控制让用户放松，想想与那些已经玩到第26关的4岁小孩相比自己是多么的差劲。这也给予用户构建误差修正战略（游戏邦注：如更大的弧线、更快的速度或其他更好的战略）的时间，使下次射击得到改善。《愤怒的小鸟》管理响应时间的原则是：快速固然好，精巧设计更佳。
短时记忆管理：在认知科学中，短时记忆（游戏邦注：下文简称“SM”）与我们记忆系统的其他类别相比极为有限，这是众所周知的事实。在过去50年里，该事实已引发数千次的研究。科学家挖掘这个人类认知层面，试图弄清SM的运作原理以及影响SM有效性的因素。在日常生活中，短时记忆让你了解到各种技术方法和总体环境。SM是种暂时性记忆，让我们可以在短暂时间内记住数量极其有限的不相关内容、行为或样式。SM让你可以在不将内容转化为长时记忆的前提下做出行动，因为转化是个更为复杂而且费时的过程。这很重要，因为SM快速且易于形成，使用户可以立即适应某种环境，转化为长时记忆的需求可能会产生致命的影响。在人机对话中，人类的短时记忆还极具易变性。这意味着记忆内容可被迅速清除，更为重要的是，内容会被其他进入人类感知系统的信息覆盖。事情产生趣味性的时机正是劣质用户界面设计影响SM需求的症结所在。比如，某个用户界面设计解决方案要求用户观看某个屏幕上的信息并存储在短时记忆中，随后在另一个屏幕的数据区中重新输入相同信息，这似乎是个毫无价值的做法。研究表明精确达成上述要求很难，尤其当第一屏数据记忆和用户在第二屏输入数据之间有某些其他形式的刺激因素流过。这种干扰性数据流可能会有各种形式，但通常是某些具有吸引力的东西，如对话、声音和动作等。最糟糕的情况是三种兼有，很可能完全清除SM。如果你在使用短时记忆完全转移数据之前遇到此类数据流，很可能在你想找回短时记忆中的重要信息时发现它们已经不复存在。
有些人可能会依此推断，任何影响短时记忆的用户界面设计层面都不是好想法。利用短时记忆的降低确实也可以改善游戏可玩性的吸引力，正如上文提到的响应时间那样，深入洞察这种令人惊奇的做法可以找到其中更为精致的观点。《愤怒的小鸟》在玩家短时记忆管理上的做法令人称奇。
通过对用户界面的简单改造，《愤怒的小鸟》设计师营造出重要的短时记忆丧失，这反倒增加了游戏玩法的复杂性。但其所采用的方式不会被玩家当成消极因素，却增加了游戏本身的沉迷性。《愤怒的小鸟》所采用的微妙且强大的概念是将短时记忆扭曲而不是破坏。如果你破坏了SM，要确保向用户提供非常简单且快速的方式精确找回记忆内容。《愤怒的小鸟》多项游戏模式都采用了此类做法。每次开局时对屏幕移动的简单控制可能是最引人入胜的实例之一。当关卡首次在屏幕上装载完成后，用户会在非常短的时间内看到保护猪的建筑结构。随后，建筑也会很快以简单的滑动行为从右侧移出屏幕。
Angry Birds(from chrisvitas.com)
用户在左侧看到的是一群健壮且叽叽喳喳的小鸟，身边有个弹弓。这些小角色产生的吸引力清除了玩家对结构设计的大部分记忆内容，而后者正是制定摧毁猪房屋战略的关键。不出所料，用户将界面滑回右侧，再看下建筑结构。游戏允许用户简单且快速地重获短时记忆。你会看到几乎每个玩《愤怒的小鸟》的人都在不断重复这种行为。在iPad上玩《愤怒的小鸟》的主要优势在于玩家可以缩小界面尺寸，这样你就能一直全视野观看整个游戏场景（游戏邦注：包括小鸟和房屋中的猪）。保持全视野观看游戏界面所有层面可防止短时记忆丢失，提高你获得必要通关技术、玩更高关卡的概率。如果你想要在《愤怒的小鸟》中获得更高层次的体验，可以在使用iPad缩小界面尺寸查看整个游戏场景的前提下用上POGO笔。这会使你的控制得到提升，更加精准地命中目标并迅速改变游戏的可玩性。但是，你也会渐渐发现游戏变得不那么有趣。为什么会出现这种情况呢？
神秘感：你可能不知道如何找到游戏的神秘感，但《愤怒的小鸟》确实有这方面的特征。所有我们觉得极为引人入胜的东西都带有神秘感，这便是该想法的背景。所有优秀的艺术作品、广告、电影和产品都带有神秘感元素或特性，毫无疑问，互动游戏也是如此。用户体验的神秘感想法潜藏于广义的神秘感想法中，该特性可增加用户的参与度。当我们观看立体派艺术家毕加索的画作、想起1984年苹果公司著名的超级碗广告或倾听Miles Davis音乐时，都在体验神秘感带来的冲击。神秘感存在于你首次拿起iPad之时。为何屏幕上的图标可以集中得如此紧凑以节省空间呢？为何默认屏幕保护程序看起来就像是位于屏幕中的水波？
神秘感属于特性的第二层次，存在但不甚明确，然而却能通过某些方法来营造，使其足够以微妙且引人入胜的方式来消耗心智资源。从最基础的层面上来说，在互动过程中体验神秘感会让你产生如下问题：“为何他们要这么做？”。我们的意思是，思考“为何他们要这么做？”是件好事，而“他们在想什么？”却不是个好问题。如果你仔细想想自己的生活经历，就会意识到最具吸引力的是那些迫使你长期且努力思考其做法缘由的事物。比如，为何Frank Gehry要将Guggenheim Museum Bilbao建成那样？这位著名的建筑师本可以建造出其他风格，为何他要选择那一种？这便是神秘感，我们无从知晓答案，或许连他自己也不知道。我们所知道的是，他的作品被称为当代最重要的建筑作品之一。建筑可以迷住数百万游客，那么神秘感同样也能让简单的互动游戏卖出数百万套。
《愤怒的小鸟》处处充满小神秘感。比如，为何有时场景中会洒满小香蕉，有时却没有？为何每次游戏开始时，猪的房屋会出现轻微晃动？为何游戏场景中会出现地下岩石和尘土的横断面？为何有时小鸟会翻跟斗跳上弹弓，有时却不会？人们会有意无意地花上大量时间来整理这些小线索。如果用户以这种方式来整理信息，就很可能更深层次地参与到游戏之中。
声音效果：过去15年间，音乐神经学突飞猛进。这项新研究正开始向我们解释为何音乐能够为电影、广告、喜剧及包括休闲电脑游戏在内的新媒体形式增加如此强烈的感情成分。利用包括音乐在内的音频刺激物通常可以增加所有科技形式用户的参与度。《愤怒的小鸟》的音频效果和音乐看似简单，但实际上非常复杂。音频效果和各种细心编排的音乐旋律有效提高了游戏的吸引力。许多游戏都这么做，但做得如此专业的为数不多。《愤怒的小鸟》中的音频紧紧围绕简单的用户心智模式（游戏邦注：即愤怒的小鸟和令人厌恶的猪之间的冲突）来制作，使用户体验得以提升。这种概念在电影制作中称为“协同动作”，在恰当的时机为用户提升反馈水平。比如在《愤怒的小鸟》中，我们能听到小鸟每次在准备时都会喋喋不休地用鸟语鼓励同伴。当小鸟飞向它们的目标时我们也可以听到叫喊声，命中目标后会听到受害者痛苦地发出回应，因而猪也并非死气沉沉。如果通关失败，游戏用咧着嘴笑的猪来鼓励玩家再试一次。所用的这些音频元素将游戏主角拟人化，使关键的屏幕上行为反馈得以加强，从而增强玩家互动并深化用户参与度。为何音乐旋律毫无理由地从前景转移至背景中呢？这种贯穿于游戏体验中的音乐线索人所共知，在游戏整体主题背景下也很容易理解。有些人觉得好像在其他地方听到过这种旋律。游戏中音频反馈结合的样式和种类恰到好处，使得坐在隔壁房间的家长很少会因为令人分心的重复音乐让孩子关掉游戏。或许这能够解释为何人们花在这款游戏上的时间如此之多！
视觉效果：《愤怒的小鸟》中存在一定的视觉效果。有些人可能会觉得《愤怒的小鸟》的视觉风格结合了“手法高明的低级动画”和许多贺卡般图形。
这产生了某个更为有趣的问题：视觉设计对游戏在市场中获得成功有何影响？我时常会听到那些准备开始重新设计游戏或施行新开发项目的客户提出这个问题。数十年前，视觉设计首先出现于汽车设计中，现在仍是设计扣人心弦用户体验中最容易引起争论的层面。设计师通常说服客户接受的观点是，界面解决方案的视觉设计（游戏邦注：即图形风格）是获得成功的关键因素。从直觉上来说，这种想法似乎确实是对的。但是，真正的制作原则却与直觉想法相反。在多数用户体验设计解决方案中，视觉设计在技术上属于保健因素。视觉设计缺失会给人带来非同小可的消极观，但如果用户界面有着优秀的视觉设计，第一印象便可以产生积极因素。在我们为客户开展用户参与度研究（游戏邦注：与可用性测试并不相同）时，通常使用的便是为此等理论提供强大支持的数据。尽管这个概念不能用来解决所有用户体验设计问题，但多数情况下依然可行。那么，最终的问题在于视觉设计达到何种程度才足够。视觉设计恰当比视觉设计的好坏更加重要。在这个度量上，《愤怒的小鸟》仍然做得恰到好处。视觉设计恰当这个概念本身就很复杂，因为设计师通常会过分侧重于此但工程师却毫不考虑，这会导致项目的发展出现两个极端，用户得到的不是劣质样品就是《魔兽世界》之类的佳作。凭借用户界面设计数十年的经验，通过查看客户产品的用户界面，我就可以相当精确地判断出那些公司的软件开发倾向。我认为Google只不过是个引擎驱动的软件，尽管该公司近年来似乎雇佣了大量UX设计师。
AngryBirds(from gameogre.com)
衡量某些人认为无法衡量的东西：在这种环境下要如何衡量视觉设计呢？目前有许多可供评估项目开发视觉设计适当性的方法。这些调查方法将那些之前被人认为只能主观评估的东西以客观方式呈现出来。视觉设计可以被衡量和评分，扩展后便能够使用户和界面开发人员受益。恰当视觉设计的度量值因应用类型不同而存在差异，但游戏设计中有两种因素显得格外重要。其一，视觉设计必须容易被人记住；其二，视觉设计必须传达游戏模式的特性。
《愤怒的小鸟》令人印象深刻，开发商已经在现实世界中制作出游戏周边产品，包括玩偶、T恤以及各种非同寻常的消费品，为公司带来大量利润。那些小卡通鸟的视觉设计是如此简单又令人印象深刻，它们使用户在游戏体验之外对其产品萌生兴趣。还必须注意到的是，鸟和猪所在的虚拟世界在每个关卡都会有奇怪且微妙的变化。视觉设计是让《愤怒的小鸟》获得成功的另一个关键层面，这又带来了一个问题：《愤怒的小鸟》是否已达顶点，无法再进行改善？如若着眼于长期发展，事实并非如此。
我们在上文中从认知层面剖析了吸引人的用户体验，比单纯回答“为何某个用户界面无法发挥作用？”这个问题要有趣的多。总而言之，在《愤怒的小鸟》中，放慢某些可以加快的行为、清除可以简单重新构建起的事物和制作神秘且令人印象深刻的视觉效果让游戏获得了成功。过去10年里，我们公司为数百个用户界面进行过用户参与度研究，如此多的研究依然没有得出通行的原则。《愤怒的小鸟》，你的成功势必让其他人感到愤怒和嫉妒！（本文为游戏邦/gamerboom.com编译，如需转载请联系：游戏邦）
Why Angry Birds is so successful and popular: a cognitive teardown of the user experience
Charles L. Mauro
The usual question: Over the past 30+ years as a consultant in the field generally known as human factors engineering (aka usability engineering), I have been asked by hundreds of clients why users don’t find their company’s software engaging. The answer to this persistent question is complex but never truly elusive. This question yields to experience and professional usability analysis.
The unusual question: Surprisingly, it is a rare client indeed who asks the opposing question: why is an interface so engaging that users cannot stop interacting with it? This is a difficult question because it requires cognitive reverse engineering to determine what interaction attributes a successful interface embodies that result in a psychologically engaging user experience. This question pops up when products become massively successful based on their user experience design – think iPhone, iPad, Google Instant Search, Nintendo Wii, Microsoft Kinect.
The interesting question: Recently clients have asked about the phenomenally successful casual computer game Angry Birds, designed for mobile phones, tablets and other platforms. For those who don’t have a clue what Angry Birds is all about, here is a quick synopsis. The game involves employing a sling shot to propel small cannonball-shaped birds with really bad attitudes at rather fragile glass and timber houses populated by basically catatonic green pigs. The basic thrust of the game is to bring about the demise of the pigs as quickly and expertly as possible by collapsing the pigs’ houses on top of their (sometimes) helmeted heads. Obviously, this sounds like a truly dumb concept. However, there is a catch.
Why is it that over 50 million individuals have downloaded this simple game? Many paid a few dollars or more for the advanced version. More compelling is the fact that not only do huge numbers download this game, they play it with such focus that the total number of hours consumed by Angry Birds players world-wide is roughly 200 million minutes a DAY, which translates into 1.2 billion hours a year. To compare, all person-hours spent creating and updating Wikipedia totals about 100 million hours over the entire life span of Wikipedia (Neiman Journalism Lab). I say these Angry Birds are clearly up to something worth looking into. Why is this seemly simple game so massively compelling? Creating truly engaging software experiences is far more complex than one might assume, even in the simplest of computer games. Here is some of the cognitive science behind why Angry Birds is a truly winning user experience.
Simple yet engaging interaction concept: This seems an obvious point, but few realize that a simple interaction model need not be, and rarely is, procedurally simple. Simplification means once users have a relatively brief period of experience with the software, their mental model of how the interface behaves is well formed and fully embedded. This is known technically as schema formation. In truly great user interfaces, this critical bit of skill acquisition takes place during a specific use cycle known as the First User Experience or FUE. When users are able to construct a robust schema quickly, they routinely rate the user interface as “simple”. However, simple does not equal engaging. It is possible to create a user interface solution that is initially perceived by users as simple. However, the challenge is to create a desire by users to continue interaction with a system over time, what we call user “engagement”.
What makes a user interface engaging is adding more detail to the user’s mental model at just the right time. Angry Birds’ simple interaction model is easy to learn because it allows the user to quickly develop a mental model of the game’s interaction methodology, core strategy and scoring processes. It is engaging, in fact addictive, due to the carefully scripted expansion of the user’s mental model of the strategy component and incremental increases in problem/solution methodology. These little birds are packed with clever behaviors that expand the user’s mental model at just the point when game-level complexity is increased. The process of creating simple, engaging interaction models turns out to be exceedingly complex. Most groups developing software today think expansion of the user’s mental model is for the birds. Not necessarily so.
Cleverly managed response time: A universal law of user interface design is “the faster the response time, the better”. True enough, there are applications where this is patently true. For example, Google has made this a mantra for their systems. However, surprisingly few software developers realize that response time management is actually a resource that can be leveraged to add to the quality and depth of engagement of a user interface. The surprising point that is often misunderstood is that not every aspect of the user interface needs to be or should be as fast as possible. Programmers uniformly have a really hard time with this one and few game designers take advantage of this potent variable. In most commercial software interfaces, response time management is completely overlooked even by those who claim to be UI design experts. The developers of Angry Birds managed response time in a way that goes far beyond simply “faster is better”.
For example, in Angry Birds, it was possible for the programmers to have made the flight of the birds fast – very fast, but they didn’t. Instead they programmed the flight of the angry flock to be leisure pace as they arc across the sky heading for the pigs’ glass houses. This slowed response time, combined with a carefully crafted trajectory trace (the flight path of the bird), solves one huge problem for all user interfaces – error correction. The vast majority of software user interfaces have no consideration for how users can be taught by experience with the system to improve their performance. This problem is a vast and complex issue for screen-based trading systems where error correction is not only essential, but also career threatening.
In Angry Birds game play the pigs also take a long time to expire once their houses are sent to bits. In many play sequences, seconds are consumed as the pigs teeter, slide and roll off planks or are crushed under slow falling debris. This response time of 3-5 seconds, in most user interfaces, brings users to the point of exasperation, but not with Angry Birds. Again, really smart response time management gives the user time to relax and think about how lame they are compared to their 4 year old who is already at the 26th level. It also gives the user time to structure an error correction strategy (more arc, more speed, better strategy) to improve performance on the next shot. The bottom line on how Angry Birds manages response time: fast is good, clever is better.
Short-term memory management: It is a well-known fact of cognitive science that human short-term memory (SM), when compared to other attributes of our memory systems, is exceedingly limited. This fact has been the focus of thousands of studies over the last 50 years. Scientists have poked and prodded this aspect of human cognition to determine exactly how SM operates and what impacts SM effectiveness. As we go about our daily lives, short-term memory makes it possible for you to engage with all manner of technology and the environment in general. SM is a temporary memory that allows us to remember a very limited number of discrete items, behaviors, or patterns for a short period of time. SM makes it possible for you to operate without constant referral to long-term memory, a much more complex and time-consuming process. This is critical because SM is fast and easily configured, which allows one to adapt instantly to situations that might otherwise be fatal if one were required to access long-term memory. In computer-speak, human short-term memory is also highly volatile. This means it can be erased instantly, or more importantly, it can be overwritten by other information coming into the human perceptual system. Where things get interesting is the point where poor user interface design impacts the demand placed on SM. For example, a user interface design solution that requires the user to view information on one screen, store it in short-term memory, and then reenter that same information in a data field on another screen seems like a trivial task. Research shows that it is difficult to do accurately, especially if some other form of stimulus flows between the memorization of the data from the first screen and before the user enters the data in the second. This disruptive data flow can be in almost any form, but as a general rule, anything that is engaging, such as conversation, noise, motion, or worst of all, a combination of all three, is likely to totally erase SM. When you encounter this type of data flow before you complete transfer of data using short-term memory, chances are very good that when you go back to retrieve important information from short-term memory, it is gone!
One would logically assume that any aspect of user interface design that taxes short-term memory is a really bad idea. As was the case with response time, a more refined view leads to surprising insights into how one can use the degradation of short-term memory to actually improve game play engagement. Angry Birds is a surprisingly smart manager of the player’s short-term memory.
By simple manipulation of the user interface, Angry Birds designers created significant short-term memory loss, which in turn increases game play complexity but in a way that is not perceived by the player as negative and adds to the addictive nature of the game itself. The subtle, yet powerful concept employed in Angry Birds is to bend short-term memory but not to actually break it. If you do break SM, make sure you give the user a very simple, fast way to accurately reload. There are many examples in the Angry Birds game model of this principle in action. Probably one of the most compelling is the simple screen flow manipulation at the beginning of each new play sequence. When the screen first loads, the user is shown a very quick view of the structure that is protecting the pigs. Just as quickly, the structure is moved off screen to the right in a simple sliding motion.
Coming into view on the left is a bevy of bouncing, chatting and flipping birds sitting behind the slingshot. These little characters are engaging in a way that for the most part erases the player ’s memory of the structure design, which is critical to determining a strategy for demolishing the pig’s house. Predictably, the user scrolls the interface back to the right to get another look at the structure. The game allows the user to reload short-term memory easily and quickly. Watch almost anyone play Angry Birds and you see this behavior repeated time and again. One of the main benefits of playing Angry Birds on the iPad is the ability to pinch down the window size so you can keep the entire game space (birds & pigs in houses) in full view all the time. Keeping all aspects of the game’s interface in full view prevents short-term memory loss and improves the rate at which you acquire skills necessary to move up to a higher game level. Side note: If you want the ultimate Angry Birds experience use a POGO pen on the iPad with the display pinched down to view the entire game space. This gives you finer control, better targeting and rapidly changing game play. The net impact in cognitive terms is a vastly superior skill acquisition profile. However, you will also find that the game is less interesting to play over extended periods. Why does this happen?
Mystery: You probably do not know how to recognize it, but Angry Birds has it. To add context to this idea, mystery is all around us in the things we find truly compelling. The element or attribute of mystery is present in all great art, advertising, movies, products, and not surprisingly, interactive games. The idea of mystery in a user experience as an attribute for increasing user engagement is embedded in the idea of mystery (conceptual depth). We all experience the impact of mystery when we view a cubist period Picasso, recall the famous Apple 1984 super bowl ad, or listen to Miles Davis. He is said to have described jazz as playing the spaces between the notes, not the notes themselves. Mystery is present when you pick up an iPad for the first time. Why are the icons spaced out across the screen when they could be clustered much closer together to save space? Why does the default screen saver look like water on the inside of the screen?
Mystery is that second layer of attributes that are present but undefined explicitly, yet somehow created with just enough context to consume mental resources in subtle and compelling ways. At its most basic level, experiencing mystery in what we interact with makes you ask the question, “Why did they do that?”. What we mean here is, “Why did they do that?” – A good thing, not “What were they thinking?” – A bad thing. If you think carefully about the experiences you have in the ebb and flow of life, you realize that the most compelling are those that force you to think long and hard about why a given thing is the way it is. For example, why did Frank Gehry create the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao using the shapes he did? The famous architect could have created any shape concept, but why did he choose those shapes? It’s a mystery – we do not know and probably neither does he. What we do know is that his creation is cited as one of the most important works of contemporary architecture. In the same way that a building can captivate millions of sightseers, the element of mystery (conceptual depth) can help sell a few million copies of a simple interactive game.
Angry Birds is full of these little mysteries. For example, why are tiny bananas suddenly strewn about in some play sequences and not in others? Why do the houses containing pigs shake ever so slightly at the beginning of each game play sequence? Why is the game’s play space showing a cross section of underground rocks and dirt? Why do the birds somersault into the sling shot sometimes and not others? One can spend a lot of time on the Acela processing these little clues, consciously or subconsciously. When users of technology process information in this way, it is very likely that they are more deeply engaged than without these small questions.
How things sound: Over the past 15 years, the neuroscience of music has taken a huge leap forward. This new research is just beginning to tell us why music adds such a strong emotional component to movies, advertising, theater, and of course, new media of all types, including casual computer games. Employing the power of audio stimuli including structured music often adds a critical level of engagement for users of all forms of technology. Angry Birds’ audio effects and music seem simple but are, in fact, very complex. The use of audio effects and carefully varied melodic music lines works to enhance the game play engagement level. Many games do this but few do it expertly. The audio in Angry Birds serves to enhance the user’s experience by mapping tightly to the user’s simple mental model of conflict between the angry birds and the loathsome pigs. This concept, known in film production as “action syncing”, provides enhanced levels of the feedback for users at just the right time. For example, in Angry Birds, we hear the birds chatter angry encouragement to their colleagues as each prepares for launch. We hear avian dialogue as the birds arc toward their targets and hear the pained response from their victims when they strike their targets. The pigs are by no means silent. When the avian interlopers fail, they are often egged on to try just one more time by the snickering, grinning pigs. These consistently applied audio elements reinforce the player’s interactions and deepen engagement by emphasizing the anthropomorphic qualities of the main characters of the game and providing clever enhanced feedback during critical on-screen behaviors. What about the actual melodic music shifting from the foreground to the background without apparent reason? This musical thread running through the game play experience is mysteriously familiar and easily understood in the context of the overall theme of the game. Where have I heard that melody before? This combination of audio feedback is varied just enough that parents sitting in the next room are rarely prone to demanding an end to game play based on distracting musical repetition. Perhaps this explains the high number of hours spent playing the game!
How things look: Angry Birds has a look. One might characterize the visual style of Angry Birds as a combination of “high-camp cartoon” with a bit of greeting card graphics tossed in for good measure.
This leads to a more interesting question: How does visual design impact success in the marketplace? I routinely get this question from clients who are undertaking large redesign or new development projects. Decades after it first surfaced in automobile design, visual design is still the most contentious aspect of designing compelling user experiences. Designers (mostly of the UX stripe) routinely sell clients on the concept that the visual design (graphic style) of a given interface solution is a critical factor in success. This assumption seems to make good intuitive sense.
However, the actual working principle is counter-intuitive. In most user experience design solutions, visual design (how things look) is technically a hygiene factor. You get serious negative points if it is missing, but minimal positive lift beyond first impression, if a user interface has great visual design. When we conduct user engagement studies for clients (not the same as usability testing), we routinely see data that strongly supports this theory. This concept does not apply to all user experience design problems, but in most cases it holds well. The ultimate question is how much visual design is enough? Even more important than good or bad visual design is appropriate visual design. On this metric, Angry Birds again has just the right set of attributes. The concept of appropriate visual design is in itself complex as designers generally apply too much rendering and engineers apply none, which often leaves the actual user staring at the equivalent of an engineering prototype (Google) or alternatively, World of Warcraft. After decades of experience in user interface design, I can predict fairly accurately the corporate software development bias of clients by simply examining the user interfaces of their products. I cannot imagine Google as anything but engineering-driven, despite the apparently large number of UX designers hired in recent years.
Measuring that which some say cannot be measured: How does one measure visual design in this context? There are several well-understood methodologies for assessing the appropriateness of visual design that we employ in development projects. These research methods make objective that which is thought to be only subjective. Visual design can be measured, rated, and scaled to the benefit of users and those who develop such interfaces. The actual dimensions of appropriate and winning visual design vary widely, depending on the application but in game design two factors reign supreme.
First, the visual design must be memorable and second, it must convey the desired attributes of the game play model.
So memorable is Angry Birds that the developers have deals for real world “brand extensions”, including Angry Birds stuffed toys, t-shirts, and all matter of off-the-wall consumer goods that make BIG profits. The simple visual design of those tiny cartoon-ish birds is so compelling and simple, it brings an additional level of continuous interest to the game play experience. Of note too is the world the birds and pigs inhabit which changes in strange and subtle ways with every level. Visual design is another critical dimension of the success of Angry Birds, which leads to the ultimate question: Is Angry Birds the best it can be? Not by a long shot!
We are left with the notion that a cognitive teardown of a truly compelling user experience is vastly more interesting and insightful than simply answering the opposite question: why is a given
user interface dysfunctional? To summarize, in the context of Angry Birds, success is bound up in slowing down that which could be fast, erasing that which is easily renewable, and making visual that which is mysterious and memorable. Over the past 10 years, our firm has conducted user engagement studies on hundreds of user interfaces. The vast number did not get one principle right, much less six. You go Birds! Your success certainly makes other Angry and envious. ()
CopyRight Since 2010 GamerBoom All rights reserved &&闽ICP备&号-1}